TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:word processing vs. desktop publishing From:"Kamela J. Salyers" <kjsalyer -at- PRAIRIENET -dot- ORG> Date:Mon, 15 May 1995 09:45:38 -0500
I know this has been a much-discussed (old, tired. . .) thread HOWEVER. . .
Our department was recently given a new manager (the fifth in four
years). Like our previous managers, the new one has no knowledge of
technical communication. The department is responsible for approx. 15
user (hard copy) manuals as well as online help text. It is a small
The new manager is questioning WHY we need to use DTP software and why a word
processing package won't meet our needs. (BTW, WordPerfect is the company-wide
package. Ventura is our DTP; however, approval was given to switch to
FrameMaker. Of course the switch is depending on whether or not we
actually need a DTP system.)
Can anyone help me with advantages and disadvantages? IMHO, we should use
Kamela J. Salyers
kjsalyer -at- firefly -dot- prairienet -dot- org