TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Shoddy Publications From:Carma C Allen <ccallen -at- CCGATE -dot- DP -dot- BECKMAN -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 23 May 1995 10:59:59 -0800
--Boundary (ID kWpfinQvo8NqhbnmeaGr/Q)
On the subject of shoddy printing/paper, I agree completely with both=
and Hal about the manual reflecting on the quality of the company's p=
However, it's not always easy to convince management (the people that=
the budget) that this is the case. They are usually willing to pay fo=
quality in advertising materials, but don't consider the user documen=
be all that important. So I disagree with Hal's p.s.:
>P.S. When you read of experiences like this, don't you feel betrayed=
one of your comrads (it's different than an engineer screwing up; we =
how to do it right)?
because the person (or group) producing the manual were probably as m=
at the quality as you were outraged. (No, we haven't had to resort to=
quite that bad, but with continual budget cuts, who knows?)
Anyway, the only way to combat the slipping of end user documenta=
quality is to complain loud and long to the company. Don't just refus=
e to buy=20
their products because the manuals are inferior=C4TELL THEM that's wh=
y you are no=20
longer spending your money with them. Most companies these days respo=
NOTHING but loss of profits, so the only way to ensure good manuals i=
s to make=20
the bean counters aware that it's costing the company money.
Okay, I'll step down from my soap box now.
These opionions do not reflect my company in any way=C4=C4in fact=
, my company=20
is unaware that I even have opinions.