TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Frame vs. Publisher vs. From:Grant Lowe <Grant_Lowe -at- CPQM -dot- SAIC -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 23 May 1995 13:27:42 U
Hi. It's me again. I just want to say thanks to everybody for all your
input. It looks like I'll be getting Frame sometime in the next week or so.
We were going to use Word, but when we found out we couldn't do the following,
we changed our collective mind:
1) Word can't do external file cross-references. This nixed the idea of
using breaking up my heavily bit-mapped files into smaller, more manageable
2) Word can't do portrait headers and footers with landscape text. This is
important as we have lots of sample reports that get printed in landscape.
Word art can only do one page at a time, a fairly severe limitation.
3) We want our headers and footers to reference the most current section
headers. Word uses cross-references that are hard-coded.
4) The vast majority of you recommended it. This reason may sound silly, but
considering the type of work we do, you all carry a lot more weight than you