TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Does anyone else get as aggravated as I do when browsing
want ads for tech-writer positions, to find prospective
employers specifying the brands/models of software tools as
REQUIREMENTS for the positions? E.g.: "XYZ Corp. seeks
user documentation specialist for its industry-leading
SoftWidget software. Documentation experience preferred.
Familiarity with MS Word [or WordPerf, or Pagemaker, etc.]
I can understand a company's need to standardize its staff
on certain tools, but why should this be a barrier to
employment for an otherwise highly qualified professional?
Don't they know that the learning curve for a different
but comparable tool (Word vs. WordPerf, PM vs. Framemaker,
PC vs. Mac, etc.) is usually just a week or two?
An analogy: "Skilled carpenter wanted. Some woodworking
experience preferred, but must use Black & Decker model