TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Certification From:John Biederman <johnb -at- MAIL -dot- ENTEK -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 20 Jul 1995 10:47:28 -0400
I'll have to weigh in on the side of those who feel that a degree does not
automatically qualify one as a technical writer. On a past job, I've worked
with a degreed technical writer who took _forever_ to learn the subject
matter, and even longer to learn how to structure information logically.
I've also gotten "certified" in an unrelated field, purely as a result of
management's requirements--and the test was no measure of my ability. So I'm
curious about developing standard measures of competence in technical
writing. Would they include me?
I have degrees in Geology, and a single (one quarter) class in Technical
Writing. I became a technical writer because I was about to be laid off as a
programmer. Now, after three years and some months, I have two "Awards of
Distinguished Technical Communication" from our Southwestern Ohio STC
competition--one for a manual, and one for online help. Are awards measures
PLEASE NOTE: I write this not to brag, but to question: what are you going
to measure? And how?
| | _ John Biederman
| | ___ | | __ _ __ Entek Scientific Corporation
_ | | / _ \ | |/_ \ | |/_ \ Cincinnati, OH 45242-3753
| |_/ || |_| || | | || | | |
\___/ \___/ |_| |_||_| |_| Phone: (513) 563-7500
**Docs On-line and On-demand** Email:johnb -at- entek -dot- com