Re: Janice Gelb Transcribes w/o Permission

Subject: Re: Janice Gelb Transcribes w/o Permission
From: Janice Gelb <janiceg -at- ENG -dot- SUN -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 16:51:49 GMT

In article <Pine -dot- SUN -dot- 3 -dot- 91 -dot- 950805163103 -dot- 1823A-100000 -at- kitfox>, David Dvorkin
<daved -at- kitfox -dot- kapre -dot- com> writes:
>We write for a living. Some of us also write on our own time for a
>second income.

>So what the hell is one of us doing transcribing an article without
>permission?

As far as I know, newspaper articles with no bylines do not get
royalties for subsequent publication that is not for profit.


********************************************************************************
Janice Gelb | The only connection Sun has with this
janiceg -at- marvin -dot- eng -dot- sun -dot- com | message is the return address.

"Usenet is like Tetris for people who still remember how to read"

********************************************************************************


Previous by Author: HUMOR: Bad Analogs, or Something...
Next by Author: Re: he/she
Previous by Thread: Re: Janice Gelb Transcribes w/o Permission
Next by Thread: Re: Janice Gelb Transcribes w/o Permission


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads