Re: FrameReader--a ghost?

Subject: Re: FrameReader--a ghost?
From: kclarke <kclarke -at- CCNET -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 20:13:25 -0700

Race, Paul D (racepa -at- whqpos4b -dot- daytonoh -dot- attgis -dot- com) wrote:

: When I investigated doing this a couple years ago, I discovered that the
: FrameViewer program would cost us over $50/CD to use - which made using
: Frame to develop hypertext docs prohibitively expensive. That was one more
: reason our team of about 50 techwriters decided to go with another package.

Well, it'll be interesting to see what the merger with Adobe brings for
FrameViewer. You would think that it'll probably be axed in favor of
Acrobat...
--
\|//////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\|/
- ====== kclarke -at- ccnet -dot- com ===== http://www.ccnet.com/~kclarke/ -
/|\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ //////////////////////////////////|\


Previous by Author: Re: Would you be angry?
Next by Author: 50-ohm or 50 ohm
Previous by Thread: Re: FrameReader--a ghost?
Next by Thread: WORD vs FRAMEMAKER


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads