TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: e-mail / social skills thank you From:Jan Boomsliter <boom -at- CADENCE -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 25 Sep 1995 07:11:16 -0700
Re your quest for suggestions on effective email:
- Put your question or thesis up top. If I don't know what you want or what
you're talking about in the first paragraph, I'll probably skip it.
- I definitely won't go to a second screen to find out what you have to say.
Therefore, if your response follows the re-post, I'll never get to it.
- If you want a personal response, put my name in the subject line; with 100
and more messages per day, I have to sift and winnow until I have time to play.
Sometimes that's days later (I like this list, but I have to work first,
- I don't want to see your personal postings. (Why in the world do I receive
mail that begins, "Steve, sorry I didn't get back to you sooner ...."?)
Re your no. 2, email has made me a better think-on-my-feet writer. Way back
when I began, I was horrified sometimes to see how what I had written sounded
in the cold of another day. The lessons continue.
On Sep 24, 11:17am, Richard G Harris wrote:
> Subject: e-mail / social skills thank you
> My post yesterday generated quite a stir -- exactly as I hoped.
> There have been wome well-thought-out responses. As you may have guessed,
> cocktail-party one-to-one communication isn't my thing either.
> Regarding e-mail though, and I'm not talking about lists (they're
> wonderful), I have a couple of pet peeves though.
> 1. Many people simply don't respond; this is infuriating and applies to
> voice mail as well. I would guess the right combination of face-to-face,
> phone calls, and e-mail probably yields the best result. Anyone have a
> winning combination?
> 2. E-mail is usually easy to send. One result is that very often people
> respond immediately, and don't think about what they're saying (typing).
> Sometimes the response doesn't seem to have anything to do with the
> original question. Other than perhaps keeping each question short and
> to the point, any suggestions?
> Dick Harris
> rgh -at- world -dot- std -dot- com
>-- End of excerpt from Richard G Harris