Re: MS Word & BMP's

Subject: Re: MS Word & BMP's
From: Tamara Peters <1455 -at- MN2 -dot- LAWSON -dot- LAWSON -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 15:14:00 CDT

To Robert: have you tried Word 7/Win95 yet? I am curious if it is any
better for you.

From: TECHWR-L[SMTP:TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu]
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 1995 2:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: MS Word & BMP's

My experience is that Microsoft Word is not up to documents that
are either long or contain non-trivial pictures. To get reliable
results, you must ditch Word.

In the short term, I suspect that 16 MB of RAM is not enough. Steal
someone else's RAM and try 24 or 32 MB.

-- Robert

P.S. Back up your work constantly if you're using Word, and never
overwrite an old backup -- creeping corruption may cause you most
recent 25 version to all have some previously undetected, yet
unrecoverable, error.

Robert Plamondon * High-Tech Technical Writing
36475 Norton Creek Road * Blodgett * Oregon * 97326
robert -at- plamondon -dot- com * (503) 453-5841
"I regret that I have but one * for my country." -- Nathan Hale

Previous by Author: Politeness Man sez: [not _totally_ off-topic...]
Next by Author: Re: Conventions for denoting typed commands, etc., in docs?
Previous by Thread: Re: MS Word & BMP's
Next by Thread: Re: MS Word & bmp's

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads