Re: Numbering

Subject: Re: Numbering
From: Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 08:28:35 MST

John Posada <jposada -at- NOTES -dot- CC -dot- BELLCORE -dot- COM> asked about

We write technical proposals for the communications industry
in response to bid and proposal solicitations ansd some of
them are quite technical. For the most part, we use
government numbering:

1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2, etc.

Now, the question.

Would I have been able to put a 2.1 if I hadn't used a 2.2?
If not, how do I do a 2.1.1 and a 2.1.2 if I hadn't used a 2.2

Could the content of 2.1 be incorporated into 2.0, and what
would have been 2.1.1, 2.1.2, etc could become 2.1, 2.2, etc.

A general rule as I understand it is that if there is only a
single subparagraph, that information can probably be included
in the higher level paragraph immediately above it.

Just a thought.

"The Web is the most exciting thing happening in computers
today... . Also, it's very exciting because Microsoft
doesn't own it." -- Steve Jobs, founder of Apple Computer

=*= Beverly Parks -- bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil =*=
=*= "Unless otherwise stated, all comments are my own. =*=
=*= I am not representing my employer in any way." =*=

Previous by Author: Re: Findlay...once again
Next by Author: Re: Numbering
Previous by Thread: Numbering
Next by Thread: Re: Numbering

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads