TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: PageMaker? what to do From:Richard Foley <richard -at- INGLE -dot- DEMON -dot- CO -dot- UK> Date:Wed, 8 Nov 1995 19:07:30 +0000
In article <951103111159_80591198 -at- emout05 -dot- mail -dot- aol -dot- com>,
KJOlberg -at- aol -dot- com wrote:
>to say what program you use. My post was short and pointed because I get
>irritated when our profession is reduced to page layout, design, and desktop
>publishing. I am a writer, not a desktop publisher. I think it's bad for our
>profession to focus so deeply on DTP. Witness the following numbers, which
>reflect how many posts I have saved on several TECHWR-L topics:
>112 posts on tools and graphics issues
>35 posts on copyrights/trademarks
>22 posts on Web issues (long v. short, etc.)
>17 on word, verb, and pronoun usage
>11 on indexing issues
>6 on optimal document size
Yea, HIT THAT STICK!
Just my 'fourpenneth' here.
I find it very frustrating that:
1 The advent of DTP seems to make every idiot into a 'page layout
2 I'm assumed to be a graphic designer when I say I'm an illustrator.
DTP, has a lot to answer for, not least of which the freedom it has given
some of us, to 'create on screen'. Whether that be images or phrases is
probably irrelevant at this stage. I hasten to add that we could all do
this before with ink invarious ways, but computers are fun, aren't they?
I digress; this is a tech writing list. NOT a desktop publishing list!