TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Rule of Thumb From:"Susan M. Leslie" <sleslie -at- NEOSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 20 Nov 1995 23:53:17 -0600
I'd like to focus my comments on how this relates to writing.
Sanford Carr writes in part:
>Making use of "Rule of Thumb" a litmus test for sensitivity to
>violence against women is neo-political, oppressive, and of
>questionable validity. It is, however, so emotionally charged that
>I'm going to lose another good phrase from my repetoire.
For me it is not a matter of "a litmus test" but rather an understanding
that someone finds a particular phrase offensive. I then have the following
* decide they shouldn't find it offensive, use it anyway and "&^$" the
* decide they shouldn't find it offensive, stop using it but harbor a
resentment that makes me unhappy
* decide that since they find it offensive I will honor their wishes and
not use it.
Writers, it seems to me, have to be aware of and sensitive to how others
receive their communications. I choose to take responsibility for an
acccurate receiption of whatever I'm trying to communicate - not just a
responsibility to state it in a way that I believe is clear. (I don't mean
to imply that everyone should do this - just that I choose to.) When I
knowingly use phrases that will upset someone else I take responsibility for
how that interferes with receiption of the concept I am trying to communicate.
If course, as a listner/reader I also take responsibility for fairly judging
when someone innocently uses a phrase that offends me and when it
communicates that they do not respect my right to draw personal boundaries.