TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: TW Backgrounds From:Simon North <snorth -at- TEDOPRES -dot- NL> Date:Mon, 18 Dec 1995 09:58:42 GMT
As usual with such sweeping generalisations, the classifications are largely
innaccurate. You have left out at least one major group: people whose
interests were too wide to allow themselves to be squashed into a niche. I
consider myself to be a member of this group and I am personally acquainted
with several more. To illustrate, at school pure mathematics was my dream
subject but I also loved eng. lit. I went to university to study maths, stats
and computing but _hated_ statistics. Transferred to english and french lit.
studies. Career choices were too limited, so re-trained as avionics technician,
followed by 6 years 'in the field' as an electronics repair technician.
Now (past 13 years), technical author with (even though I say it myself) a
thorough understanding of electronics, software (several languages,
right down to compiler internals) and a wide range of engineering disciplines.
I am by no means an exception (certainly not in Europe at least). We are simply
people who never call decide between 'arts' and 'sciences'. Technical writing
is probably the only discipline that so perfectly combines the two.
mailing from, but not for ...