Re[2]: Tech Writer's test

Subject: Re[2]: Tech Writer's test
From: Steve English <senglish -at- MICROS -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 11:17:40 EST


In the space of today's short posting, you:

- Admitted you might have goofed
- Made a sincere effort to patch up a misunderstanding
- Demonstrated that you don't take yourself too seriously
- Put 4 sentences together in a clear and cogent fashion
- Made a joke or two of your own.

I regret to inform you, therefore, that you are unfit for elective

Steve English

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Tech Writer's test
Author: svictor -at- lgc -dot- com at SMTPLINK-Micros
Date: 12/20/95 10:52 AM

Jeffrey Pittman wrote:

> Techwhirlers:
> Good grief! I have the wit of a sun-baked brick, but even I recognized
> the humorous nature of this post. No wonder we end up with such duds in our
> elected offices! :-)>
> Keep on grinnin',
> J.P.

OK, OK, so I didn't get it. It's not the first time I haven't gotten
what passes for wit on this list.

So which of the many duds in elected office are you comparing me to? At
this point, either party should provide numerous examples.


Stephen P. Victor svictor -at- lgc -dot- com
Landmark Graphics Corporation svictor -at- compassnet -dot- com
15150 Memorial Drive
Houston, TX 77079 USA De gustibus non disputandum est

Previous by Author: Re[2]: Tech Writer's test
Next by Author: Re: Humorous musings passed on via a med student (Happy Holi
Previous by Thread: Re: Tech Writer's test
Next by Thread: Re: Tech Writer's Test

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads