TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:certification From:"Thomas F. Remington" <remingtf -at- DSSRV01 -dot- DS -dot- DUPONT -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 2 Jan 1996 15:13:41 -0500
I have a different perspective than most on certification. By training and
early experience, I am a clinical psychologist. I have an MS from Oklahoma
State (hi, Eric!), and I have several years of experience in the mental
health field, most of which I got _before_ I went for my MS.
The degree I got from OSU was their "mental health specialist" master's
degree. For that, I took all of the clinical courses that I would have taken
for a PhD. (For a PhD, I would have taken a bunch of courses in experimental
psych, social psych, etc.)
With this degree, I have all of the _training_ that I would have gotten with
a PhD. I have _more_ clinical training than a psychiatrist generally gets.
However, I don't have any _real_ professional credentials. I happen to be a
good shrink, and I have good training. That and 75c will get me a cup of
coffee! So, after a few other career changes (I've been an ambulance jockey,
radio advertising sales rep, and a computer jockey), I'm a tech writer. I
happen to be good at it, or so my peers and clients tell me.
Yes - it would certainly be a good step toward attaining a form of
credibility. I get a lot of resistance from potential clients because, after
all, anybody can write, right?
No - how do you design a test to evaluate all the intangible qualities that
go into making a good TW?
Yes - we need something to police our own ranks, to help to weed out the
folks who give our profession a bad name.
No - sheesh! What about all of the folks who've been in the profession for a
long time? Do we grandparent them? Or do we test them too?
It's a puzzlement, for sure!
DuPont External Affairs Technical Publications
Opinions expressed are mine; they have nothing whatever to do with what my
employer does or doesn't think.