TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> John Bell asked "how long is too long" in the context of
> pre-employment tests or interviews.
> As an employer, I would love to grill a candidate for hours
> to determine every minute detail of their strengths and
> weaknesses, but that's not likely to be a good use of my
> time or the candidate's... particularly with multiple
> So what's a fair balance? As an employer or a prospective
> employee, I'd lean towards two hours, perhaps divided
> equally into interview and test. That's manageable for the
> employer, and the sort of time loss you can make up over a
> week or two of overtime if you're an employee.
Now wouldn't a certification test that you only have to take ONCE be
nice here? Wouldn't it save you (the writer) a lot of travel time and
expense, and you (the employer) a lot of time and headaches?
|George Allaman | |
|Tech Writer | <clever, meaningful |
|Denver, Colorado | quip which somehow |
|Office (303) 624-1619 | summarizes my life |
|Home (303) 771-8060 | philosophy> |
|Alternate: georgea -at- csn -dot- net | |