TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Re: Framemaker From:WandaJane Phillips <wandajp -at- ANDYNE -dot- ON -dot- CA> Date:Wed, 24 Jan 1996 18:56:46 -0500
Alexandria G. Khalil wrote:
> When I first began using FrameMaker I also hated it and found it
> difficult. It wouldn't do things the way I was used to doing them in
> other packages. However, when I began using it and learning Frame's
> language and technique I found it quite easy to use. My suggestion is
> that when you are learning to use Frame forget how things are done in
> other packages. Learn FrameMaker as if it were the first time you were
> using a dtp package for the first time. Follow Frame's manual to the
> letter and you will soon find that it is not difficult and nor
> backwards.and Kent Newton wrote
> >found it one of the most non-intuitive, backwards applications in the
While I would NOT call myself a *Frame-lover*, I do concur with the
advice to forget all that came before and start fresh with Frame. I just
about cried myself to sleep while trying to learn Frame, but now I have
picked up the model and can work quite comfortably. I have even begun to
appreciate some of Frame's features, such as conditional text and
hypertext links in the ToC.
Senior Technical Writer -- Pablo
Usual disclaimers in effect