Re: Passive voice

Subject: Re: Passive voice
From: Tammy Hale <tammyh -at- FGM -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 10:34:18 -0500


Thanks to the two people who pointed out that "use of the passive voice is
rarely defensible" is in the active voice. I'm surprised I haven't heard
from more of you. (That's not an invitation. :-) )

My apologies to David F. I was wrong about the passive voice in that
particular sentence.

tammyh -at- fgm -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: passive voice
Next by Author: TW on the development team
Previous by Thread: Passive Voice
Next by Thread: [Re:] What's with the new docs?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads