TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:K vs k From:chuckm -at- MDHOST -dot- CSE -dot- TEK -dot- COM Date:Tue, 30 Jan 1996 12:49:01 PST
David Dubin wrote:
> Brad Barnes, in his response to my suggestion that the decade of 2000 be
> called 2K wrote the following, "No, 2K won't do. 1K means 1024, and 2K
> means 2048. I guess you could refer to the years 1924 as 1K and 2048
> as 2K..."
> Although he is correct as far as computers go, most of the rest of the world
> and the American military will tell you that K stands for Kilo..., which of
> course, stands for SINGLE THOUSANDS in the metric system. After all Brad, does
> a 5K run cover the distance of 5120 meters?
And the American military and the rest of the world would be wrong. :-)
The SI symbol for kilo is lowercase k, not uppercase K. I've noted a
convention that arising that K represents 1024 and k represents 1000. Thus,
the 5k run would be 5000 meters.
I don't speak for nobody, not even me!