Re: Line length

Subject: Re: Line length
From: Kris Olberg <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 12:04:49 -0800

At 03:04 PM 2/1/96 CST, you wrote:

> In his study, Wheildon found that the optimum range for line length
> was between 20 and 60 characters. His actual observations:

> -- 38% of readers found body type set wider than 60 characters hard
> to read. A further 22% indicated they probably wouldn't read wide
> measure body type even though they didn't find any difficulty
> reading it.

> -- 87% said they found extremely narrow measure, such as less than
> 20 characters, hard to read.


Did the study take point size into account? Do you know if the study is
available for viewing via the WWW?

Regards...Kris
--------------------------------


Previous by Author: Help with TW Skills
Next by Author: Re: "has no" versus "does not have"
Previous by Thread: Line length
Next by Thread: Re: Line length


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads