TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Ragged Right From:"Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 7 Feb 1996 16:16:13 -0800
At 9:59 AM 2/7/96, Virginia L. Krenn wrote:
> Copied below is an exchange from a newsgroup in which I participate. I
> would like to receive comments from the people on this list about the
> last paragraph concerning ragged right. Of course, I would also welcome
> comments on the other ideas expressed in this exchange.
> >> When using proportionally-spaced fonts, you don't double space
> >> between sentences. This is a typography rule that has existed for
> >> a few centuries.
> > Research has shown that the use of more than one space after
> > punctuation marks causes what is known to writers as 'rivers'. They
> > drag the reader's eyes down the page vertically and make it more
> > difficult to read horizontal text. Additionally, the use of right
> > justification causes extra spaces to be inserted between words. For
> > the same reason as stated above, ragged right is preferred.
What you've got here, Virginia, is a complete set of sweeping
generalizations about typesetting. ;-)
The original poster is correct in that the convention is to use
a single space between sentences in proportionally-spaced text.
Although readability tests indicate that a slightly larger space is
warranted between sentences, two spaces is too much, em-spaces are
too cumbersome to insert, so you concede and go with one.
The issue of ragged-right vs. right-justified text is complicated
by line length, hyphenation, and micro-justification (adding inter-
Short lines of text are difficult to typeset -- you see problems
in newspapers all the time where only two words fit on a line so
one is left and the other is right with an enormous space in
between -- or only one word fits on the line and the letters are
s p a c e d w a y o u t o n t h e l i n e. ;-)
If words are not hyphenated intuitively you cut down on
comprehension, but a lack of hyphenation can leave rivers of
white space in paragraphs. All these things add up to make right-
justification difficult to do *well*.
OTOH, ragged-right eliminates or de-emphasises these problems
and it's also been shown in some readability studies (and I'm
sorry, I don't have any ref's at hand) that the difference in
line length can help readers track their place -- they don't
get lost in lines that are all the same lenght so their reading
As a general rule, anything that distracts the reader from the
*words* is a bad thing.
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com