Re: Message Confirmation?? Let's get the facts straight

Subject: Re: Message Confirmation?? Let's get the facts straight
From: scot <scot -at- HCI -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 15:40:56 +1000

Yes, let's get the facts straight indeed!

>Nein, nein, nein, nein, nein! My experience with the listserv is that it
>takes it no more than a minute or two to respond to commands, so it should
>take no longer than that to look at the message and send a copy of it back
>to the return address. You should be able to recognize your own message in
>a fraction of a second and give it an OK (however that is done) and send
>it on its way. It might mean your message goes out to the list 5 minutes
>later than it would have before, but that's about it.

This is not true if you are at the end of a UUCP connection or some other
type of intermittent gateway. Not everyone has the advantage of an 'instant'
SMTP connection to anywhere in the Internet.

ciao, scot.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
#include witty.quote.here. HCI Consulting, Sydney, AU
#include std.disclaimer. http://www.hci.com.au/
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-


Previous by Author: [no subject]
Next by Author: RED and GREEN should not be seen ...
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: Message Confirmation?? Let's get the facts straight
Next by Thread: Re: Message Confirmation?? Let's get the facts straight


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads