TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
THANKS! to everyone who contributed to my HTML Editor inquiries! I really
appreciate the many thoughtful and timely responses I received.
In case you're interested, here's the body of the resulting post I sent to
my mgr, who requested the information in the first place:
>>I perused the Web for HTML editors reviews (at the magazine sites), and
polled >>the techwriters and winhelp mailing lists. The opinions were all
over the board, but I >>caught enough of a trend to go ahead and send you
the following >>recommendations:
>>Internet Assistant: NO.
>>Although several people thought it was a good tool, most did not. The most
>>common criticisms were that it only supports basic HTML, does not support
>>Netscape extensions, places tags that aren't HTML 2.0 compliant, and
requires >>authors to tweak the code before they can get a *real* Web page.
There is a better >>version for Win95, but it is still not a polished
product, and if we're going to require >>authors to have Win95 (or NT 3.51),
we should go with FrontPage 1.1 (see below).
>>While votes and positive reviews came in for at least a dozen other tools,
Hotdog >>earned at least five times as many raves as any other product. For
reviews on the >>Web, see the PC Magazine site at:
>>http://www.pcmag.com/IU/itools/reviews/editors.htm and Hotdog's review
site at: >>http://www.sausage.com/reviews.htm. I've downloaded it, tried out
a few tags and >>other features, then opened the results in Netscape, all in
just a few minutes. I did >>compare it w/ WebEdit, and I liked WebEdit's
U.I. better, but lacking the time for a >>thorough trial, I'll stick w/ the
consensus pick: Hotdog.
>>Negatives: Hotdog just represents the best of the stand-alone HTML editing
tools, >>which are useful in creating Web pages, but it is lacking as an
overall Web-site >>development, management, and maintenance tool.
>>Cost: 30-day trial version is free. Full license is $99.95 (there's a
site-license >>discount as well).
>>This is the total package. It hides the HTML code while letting authors
select from a >>template, supplies a "Personal Web Server" to use in
development, includes >>Wizards to automate Web-page creation, allows local
and remote authoring >>teams to work on a single site, includes web server
administration tools, such as a >>Link View to show all paths to and from
any page, AND is from Microsoft. For a full >>list of features, see the
copies of the datasheets, FAQ sheets, and so on.
>>System requirements are pretty heavy: 486 or higher, 16 Mb memory
>>recommended, 16 Mb hard-disk space, SVGA 256-color video recommended,
>>and Winsock 1.1-compliant TCP/IP or later.
>>Current version 1.0 is 16-bit app., and runs on Win3.1, but version 1.1,
which is in >>beta, and is due in August, is 32-bit, and requires Win95 or
Win NT 3.51 ... and MS >>is dropping development on the 16-bit version.
>>There is no free trial for the 16-bit version, but it is available on a
30-day >>money-back guarantee basis for $149. Part no. 392-00015 (call MS
product >>information @ 882-8080).
>>There is a demo version of the 1.1 beta available from the Web site, and
I've >>loaded it on my Win95 PC. It's very elegant! Come take a look if
sheldon -dot- siegel -at- attws -dot- com
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net