Re: Indexes for Discussion Lists (such as this) -Reply

Subject: Re: Indexes for Discussion Lists (such as this) -Reply
From: "Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 14:40:07 -0700

Bill Sullivan responded to Brad:
>>>But changes that make this newsgroup less vibrant and more mediated
>move us in the wrong direction.

>I'm with Brad here. Let's keep this thing loosey-goosey, and never
>mind those turkey-lurkeys out there.

Are those the technical terms for "keep your rules off my list", Bill???
;-)
I'm in complete agreement here! And I've voiced this sentiment before
when similar suggestions have popped up. If you really need to
organize something, go home and alphebetize your spice rack, please.
Techwr-l works just fine the way it is.

Sue Gallagher
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com
-- The _Guide_ is definitive.
Reality is frequently inaccurate.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: Indexing online documents
Next by Author: Re: Standard style manuals
Previous by Thread: Re: Indexes for Discussion Lists (such as this) -Reply
Next by Thread: Re: Indexes for Discussion Lists (such as this)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads