TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Questions on Win3.1 GUI From:Susan Schulken <SSchulken -at- NEA -dot- ORG> Date:Thu, 2 May 1996 10:25:58 EDT
I have two questions about standards for Windows 3.1 user interfaces.
I have a copy of "The Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design,"
for Win95 and NT but can't find the answers I need there. If you know of a
resource that can address these (and similar) questions, please let me know.
OK, here are the questions:
1. Drop-down list box indicators in data entry windows
One application includes several data entry windows with
drop-down list boxes. The drop-down indicator does not
appear until the user clicks or tabs to the box. Does this
conform to Windows 3.1 standards?
2. Text boxes with read-only text
The application also includes many text boxes with read-only
text. In most Windows applications I've seen, regular text boxes
have a white background, and read-only text boxes have a gray
In this application, both regular and display-only text boxes have
a white background. The regular text boxes use the standard
3D field border style (black and white, with gray sunken border),
and the display-only text boxes use a 2D solid black border.
Problem: It's difficult to distinguish visually between the regular
and display-only text boxes. But, the developers insist that they're
following "the Windows 3.1 standard." (Is there such a thing...?)
Thanks for your help.
=== Susan Schulken, Writing Consultant
=== National Education Association
=== Internet: SSchulken -at- nea -dot- org
Only the individual sender is responsible for the content
of this message, and the message does not necessarily reflect
the position or policy of the National Education Association.
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net