Re: Justification/Apology

Subject: Re: Justification/Apology
From: John Gough <gough -at- AUSTIN -dot- ASC -dot- SLB -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 13:55:43 -0500

Andrew Woodhouse sez:
>Now I'm no perfectionist, and I know that the nature of mailing
>is that they can be a bit anarchic, but shouldn't this be moderated in some way
>- if not by the listowner then by the members themselves?

What if someone proposed to run your local pub according
to Robert's Rules of Order? Would you still want to go?
Anarchy has its rewards.

If you want organized information of defined relevance, this isn't the place.
Try a conference (or its proceedings).

Rule o' Life: there's more dirt than gold. Bring your own shovel.


PS: list guidelines are posted periodically, which you
know because you've been lurking for six months. Right?
John Gough gough -at- austin -dot- asc -dot- slb -dot- com
Technical Consultant johngough -at- aol -dot- com
Schlumberger -- Austin Product Center C1.147 -- (512) 331-3656

Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net

Previous by Author: mouse button labels in space
Next by Author: Re: Jobs, the industry, etc.
Previous by Thread: Re: Justification/Apology
Next by Thread: Re: A. Woodhouse: your disappointment

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads