Re: Functionality

Subject: Re: Functionality
From: "Dixon, Paul" <Paul -dot- Dixon -at- FMR -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 15:24:00 -0400

It's not a word. People think it is, but it isn't. Try using function or
functions.
----------
From: Technical Writers List; for all Technical Communication issues
To: A207708
Subject: Functionality
Date: Wednesday, May 22, 1996 2:36PM

<<File Attachment: HEADERS.TXT>>

Howdy! Can I get some opinions on using the word "functionality" -- is it
just an inflation of "function" (some of my best friends are engineers) or
is it worth the difference? Thanks.

Elsa Kapitan-White
Schlumberger Oilfield Marketing Services
(713)275-7563, fax -8545

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: Re: Frame Cross-platform question
Next by Author: Re: Functionality
Previous by Thread: Functionality
Next by Thread: Re: Functionality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads