Re: Functionality

Subject: Re: Functionality
From: Elsa Kapitan-White <kapitan-white -at- SUGAR-LAND -dot- OILFIELD -dot- SLB -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 14:53:11 -0500

Paul Dixon replied that functionality is "not a word. People think it is,
but it isn't. Try using function or functions." It is a word, according
to Webster's Collegiate (10th ed.), where it's tacked on to the end of
"functional".



Elsa Kapitan-White
Schlumberger Oilfield Marketing Services
(713)275-7563, fax -8545

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: Functionality
Next by Author: Need help - System documentation
Previous by Thread: Re: Functionality
Next by Thread: Re: Functionality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads