Functionality (redux)

Subject: Functionality (redux)
From: Sue Heim <sue -at- RIS -dot- RISINC -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 09:38:50 PST

Hey all! Thought it was amusing to read this little snippet this morning...
this is from Paul Neshamkin at Wextech Systems (we were discussing
deadlines on the WinHelp list):

> >>Actually, with commercial products, the manuals must be completed
> >>well in advance of the code going golden. There has to be lead
> >>time for printing, etc. Also functionality should be frozen long
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>before release. Am I hearing that this is not true in the real
> >>world? <g>

There's that darned word again!! <grin>

...sue
-------------------------
Sue Heim
Research Information Systems
Carlsbad, California USA
Email: Sue -at- ris -dot- risinc -dot- com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: Re: Functionality
Next by Author: Re: doc to help theory
Previous by Thread: Using the MS logo in your manual
Next by Thread: Frame Cross-platform question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads