Re: Functionality

Subject: Re: Functionality
From: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 16:02:03 PDT

>Forgive me (my OED is at home), but when was the last time the OED and its
>Supplement were updated? I find the OED great for the history of a word, but
>not that useful when it comes to modern usage or recent words.

If an utterance isn't a word unless it's in the OED, then it's obviously
impossible to add new words to the OED. This may come as quite a shock
to the people who are so busily compiling definitions for the next edition.

In any event, the English language as a whole has no official defining
body. Even if it did, linguists would laugh at it and the population at
large would ignore it.

Humpty-Dumpty understood the functionality of language rather well.

-- Robert
--
Robert Plamondon, President/Managing Editor, High-Tech Technical Writing, Inc.
36475 Norton Creek Road * Blodgett * Oregon * 97326
robert -at- plamondon -dot- com * (541) 453-5841 * Fax: (541) 453-4139

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: Re: Including Screen Captures
Next by Author: Re[2]: Doing your own graphics (an illustrators perspective)
Previous by Thread: Re: Functionality
Next by Thread: Re: Functionality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads