Re: Digital Cameras -- Responses and Finding

Subject: Re: Digital Cameras -- Responses and Finding
From: "Matthew B. Hicks" <matt -at- UNIDATA -dot- UCAR -dot- EDU>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 08:12:09 -0600

On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, Cheryl Dwyer wrote:

*>4. Some questioned the validity of spending ~$1000 (US) when it could be
*>semi-obsolete within months, replaced by something better and cheaper,
*>recommending instead that we use a good 35mm and either:

Name one piece of computer-related equipment that that is not the case
for.

*>(1) Scan the pictures into the system.
*>(2) Have them developed into CD ROM format (this would seem rather
*>expensive, especially for just a few shots at a time).

We had 6 or 8 shots put on a Photo CD for about $12. For that we got each
picture at 4 different resolutions and the quality was far superior to
that of any low-end digital camera. It's worth considering.

+ - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - +
-Matt Hicks matt -at- unidata -dot- ucar -dot- edu
"This planet just stepped over the line, assemble the giant robot!"
-Dick Solomon, "3rd Rock from the Sun"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: communication of another sort
Next by Author: Entertaining TW (was: Information Mapping)
Previous by Thread: Digital Cameras -- Responses and Finding
Next by Thread: Re: Icon Design


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads