TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Wordiness and Complete Sentences From:Sarah Perrault <sarahp -at- KEYSAFE -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 21 Jun 1996 08:08:00 PDT
>I am leaning toward reworking a significant portion of the manual in
>favor of incomplete sentences where appropriate/useful/necessary.
>What would/do you do? Agree? Disagree? Thoughts? Comments?
When writing for admins/programmers, I'd use the style they prefer - after
all, we try to tailor the docs to the audience, right?
When I write for a non-technical audience I often do both -- "bury" the
information in complete sentences, but also provide lists, tables,
appendices etc that give "unburied" access to the same stuff. In one manual,
I presented the same information four ways. This was an extreme example, but
it worked -- once in paragraph/explanation format, once in a table, and
twice in flow charts. (I would have done only one flow chart but my division
head made a chart *he* liked so I put it in too.)
Supra Products, Inc.
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net