TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Quality problem with a contractor--advice needed
Subject:Re: Quality problem with a contractor--advice needed From:Averil Strauss <averil -at- LEGENDCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:08:11 -0400
Has anyone talked with the contract writer?! Please do so. Many times a
solution can be reached easily, if both sides talk. The writer may be
expecting to hear from your company. Allow the person a chance to salvage
> I know there's a lot of contractors on this list, so I hope you'll be
> able to help me with a situation my company is dealing with right now.
> We engaged a contract tech writer through a local placement agency to
> do a 1 month contract that involved revising an existing procedure
> manual as well as creating some new procedures. The revisions went OK,
> but the new material was nowhere near detailed enough to be considered
> a complete and useful document. The writer delivered the draft only a
> few days before the contract was up, so there was not sufficient time
> for it to be properly reviewed, much less revised by the writer.
> Now, the manager who engaged the writer doesn't want to pay the
> remaining bills to the agency for what he considers a virtually
> useless document. The agency said they have already paid the writer,
> and they can't afford to have more work done at their expense, but
> they can offer us another writer to finish the project if we're
> willing to pay.
> Please realize that I'm somewhat of an observer to all this. I offered
> to find a contractor for this area of the company since I did not have
> staff available for this project, but after the selection was made I
> had nothing to do with the management of the project.
> BTW, the project specifications were made quite clear to the
> writer--how many pages needed to be revised, what new processes needed
> to be documented, and sample procedures from the existing manual were
> available for review.
> Well, what do you think? What is the agency's obligation to us, and
> vice versa, and how do you think we can get this resolved? I
> certainly have my own opinions, but I'm curious to hear what others
> have to say.
> Brett Peruzzi
> First Data Investor Services Group
> Boston, MA
> Brett -dot- Peruzzi -at- fdc-invest -dot- com
> **Still only speaking for myself, not my employer**
>Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
>Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
>Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net