Re: Quality problem with a contractor

Subject: Re: Quality problem with a contractor
From: Henry Crews <Henry_Crews-AHC001 -at- EMAIL -dot- MOT -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 14:05:23 -0500

It seems to me that a 1 month time frame is not very long considering there
must be even a short period of time for learning. Also, I think the project
was managed poorly if they waited for the last few days to even get draft
copies to review. Was there a time line established at the beginning and
was was the esperience of the person who estimated the time frame for the
work? Just some thoughts.
Henry

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net


Previous by Author: What's next after tech. writing
Next by Author: Re: CHAT re: 111s and 000s
Previous by Thread: Technical Writing Position
Next by Thread: Re: Quality problem with a contractor


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads