Re: Professionalism, no accident

Subject: Re: Professionalism, no accident
From: Brad Connatser <concom -at- USIT -dot- NET>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 13:55:53 GMT

In article <199608191226 -dot- FAA12616 -at- dfw-ix12 -dot- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com>, Richard Farley
<rtfarley -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com> wrote:

snip

> So follow the guidelines!

snip

Whew! That one whistled with steam. I think that Richard is absolutely
wrong about "following the guidelines." Besides, I think that Eric's
guidelines are grey and fuzzy enough to allow soap-box posts, just like
the one Richard made! What's so hard about passing up the posts whose
subject lines don't interest you, anyway?

snip

> Every freedom that has ever
> been lost was on account of blatant disregard for the guidelines that came
> with it.

snip

Probably the opposite is true, yet I would never use an absolute like
"every" (irony intended).

Brad

--
Brad Connatser
Concurrent Communications
concom -at- usit -dot- net

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-



Previous by Author: Re: Recurring topics
Next by Author: Re: FW: Oh yes it is appropriate
Previous by Thread: Professionalism, no accident
Next by Thread: Mac vs. PC survey results are on WWW


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads