TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Information Mapping From:Len Olszewski <saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 30 Aug 1996 13:19:02 GMT
In article <m0uwIWT-004AOqC -at- iquest -dot- net>, Tim Altom <taltom -at- IQUEST -dot- NET> writes:
|> Well, I have to confess to being confused. I'd always heard that among its
|> few virtues Info Mapping could count a relatively painless conversion
|> to/from SGML, because Info Mapping encourages you to disassociate each chunk
|> from its neighbors. This would seem to be a natural for SGML.
It's easy to physically see the end product IM document and
mentally associate each of the text chunks with an SGML DTD
element (assuming you have a nicely formulated DTD with which
you are familiar). The problem comes in taking the electronic
markup which produced the formatted table, and automatically
mapping the text elements to SGML markup via a program. This is
|> Are you saying that most tools (Word comes to mind) have to resort to tables
|> to make IM work?
I haven't dealt with info mapping for about 6 years, and there
weren't any tools specifically devoted to creating IM documents
back then. Most of the IM documents I've seen are lined pages
with text in the cells of the grid and running heads identifying
the type of info on the page. This is nothing more or less than
a table. Table markup is ugly. Converting table markup to a
content-tagging system is hard. I know this from experience.
Len Olszewski My opinions; you go get your own.
saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com
TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-