Re: Let us test

Subject: Re: Let us test
From: Sabahat Ashraf <sabahat -at- OPENIX -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 15:28:41 -0400

Kris Olberg wrote:

> Wolf, pictures should be allowed. A test of professional ability
> should not
> restrict the tools used.

Actually, I would be game for having whatever restrictions the test
designer [I think that is the job description] thinks fit. Only I would
ask that the situation be as realistic as possible besides being
generic, or requiring no field-specific knowledge or whatever ... I
mean, haven't all of us had to do something with a less-than-optimum
tool due to some real world constraint or other: "the client has Word
2.01a, so we *have* to use the same or lower" was the first thing I came
up against in my professional life. But yes, the restrictions should
have been made clear in the test question.

Sabahat.

--
sabahat -at- openix -dot- com - ashrafs -at- rpi -dot- edu
(201) 301 4232 (off) (201) 287 1405 (res)
www.rpi.edu/~ashrafs

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-



Previous by Author: Info Mapping/Editing Comments/Good School
Next by Author: Re: Boiler plate text insertion for HTML
Previous by Thread: Re: let us test
Next by Thread: Re: Let us test


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads