TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Let Us Test From:Stephen Victor <svictor -at- LGC -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 11 Sep 1996 09:07:12 -0500
Daniel Wise wrote:
> To Steven Victor: If discussions of the crap we have to put up with are not
> relevant to this list, what is? I get bored with all the posts discussing how
> many angels can dance on Bill Gates' head. IMHO, there is more to the life of
> a TW than the latest DTP software, most of which we don't (and probably won't)
Hmmm, I can't say I recall ever seeing a post discussing how many angels
can dance on Bill Gates' head, at least not on this list. Regarding the
testing thread, which I was addressing in my post, another list member
wrote to me privately asking why I seemed to have a problem with it.
I'll repeat what I said to her:
For writers responsible for describing trips to the grocery store to
purchase particular types of lettuce, the thread is indeed relevant. For
the vast majority of technical writers, however, I imagine that a test
demonstrating the ability to document hardware, software, or mechanical
processes would be more appropriate.
I'm a professional, and my time is valuable. If I went to an interview
and was handed a test about grocery stores or pasta (or peanut butter
sandwiches, as in the last incarnation of this thread) I'd pick up my
things and walk out the door. Writing tests are fine, but for heaven's
sake can't we find tests that aren't so silly?
I hate to sound like such a curmudgeon, but I take my profession
seriously, and I expect prospective employers to do the same.
(short for Stephen, not Steven. If I had a nickel for every time I've
Stephen P. Victor svictor -at- lgc -dot- com
Landmark Graphics Corporation svictor -at- compassnet -dot- com
15150 Memorial Drive http://www.compassnet.com/~svictor
Houston, TX 77079 USA De gustibus non disputandum est
Searchable archives located at http://www.documentation.com/
ALL questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-