Re: 3.1 or 95

Subject: Re: 3.1 or 95
From: Sue Heim <sue -at- RIS -dot- RISINC -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 09:59:17 PST

Tim Altom referred to guessing the numbers as "SWAG."
Someone else wanted to know what SWAG meant, so Kris Olberg wrote:
> Short for "(something) wild-*ss guess." I can't remember what the
> "s" stands for. Essentially, it translates to a wild guess.

I've always heard SWAG as being an acronym for:
Sophisticated Wild Assed Guess...

Sue Heim
Research Information Systems
Carlsbad, California USA
Email: Sue -at- ris -dot- risinc -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: Cross-platform on-line documentation
Next by Author: Tool for creating on-line tutorials
Previous by Thread: Re: 3.1 or 95
Next by Thread: Re: help:maps on line

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads