TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Looking for Copyright info From:Tracy Boyington <trlyboyi -at- GENESIS -dot- ODVTE -dot- STATE -dot- OK -dot- US> Date:Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:02:39 +0000
> I have a dilemma. It is regarding copyright. There is someone in my organization who
> feels that it's perfectly ok to "steal" graphics (GIF files) from other web sites for
> use on a site we are creating for a client. I'm not comfortable with this - isn't it a
> violation of copyright?
You are correct -- this is absolutely a violation of copyright unless
the owner of those images specifically states that they are available
for free use. And even then you could be on shaky ground; some people
offer "copyright-free" graphics that they stole from other people's
> In other words, if a web page contains a copyright statement,
> doesn't it cover all contents (text and graphics) on that page.
Yes. And even if it doesn't contain a copyright statement, the
text and graphics are *still* copyrighted. Here's an excerpt from a
post to the Hypertext Writers Guild's mailing list (including some
> It is no longer necessary to register a work: the
> copyright is created at the same time that the work
> is "fixed in any media"--and, yes, electronic files
> specifically count.
> No registration is necessary, no checks, no
> double copies.
> If you made it, you own the copyright until
> you transfer it.
> Now, if you want to SUE someone over
> your copyright, you will then need to register
> it (this is a common source of confusion between
> the old and new laws), but that's also become
> a simpler process.
> However, you don't need to register in order to
> "enforce" a copyright: normally, informing
> someone by letter of the fact that you hold the
> copyright in a verifiable way is enough to
> alert them to the fact that they would LOSE a
> court case; the problem gets resolved without
> going to court, and no registration is required.
> Again, I know this is such a major change that
> many people, particularly those looking at some
> of the classic references, are confused by it.
> Here are some very helpful URLs which should
> clear up the confusion:
Tracy Boyington trlyboyi -at- genesis -dot- odvte -dot- state -dot- ok -dot- us
Oklahoma Department of Vocational & Technical Education
Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA http://genesis.odvte.state.ok.us/cimc/home.htm