Re: accuracy from reviewers?

Subject: Re: accuracy from reviewers?
From: Kris Olberg <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:40:23 -0700

At 05:04 PM 10/1/96 -0700, you wrote:
>Given the fact that reviewers generally have 101 other things they'd
>rather be doing than reviewing your document, how do people try to ensure
>accuracy from reviewers?

Do you hold "review meetings"? This is a good place to verbally highlight potential problem areas. Often, it fosters discussion between developers. But here's a side effect: sometimes it stimulates well-reasoned changes to the product ... )-:

kjolberg -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com (preferred)
kjolberg -at- aol -dot- com
kolberg -at- actamed -dot- com
102031 -dot- 3556 -at- compuserve -dot- com
s -dot- othoudt -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net

Previous by Author: Lone writers Was: job negotiation for beginner
Next by Author: Re: Re[2]: documentation on the WWW
Previous by Thread: accuracy from reviewers?
Next by Thread: Re: accuracy from reviewers?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads