TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Following From:"NIVA Inc." <niva -at- MAGI -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 4 Oct 1996 15:52:37 -0400
John Bell writes:
>> One software guide I have uses this construction quite often.
>> "Following are description of the fields in the Positioning tab:" <snip>
>> It seems so awkward. <snip>
>> Is it a matter of preference or is "The following ...." better/worse than "Following..."?
The word "following" can be either a noun or an adjective. Presumably, "following" used alone is acting as a noun; however, in most intances, the writer clearly intends the adjectival use. Among my colleagues, I correct such use by reminding them that "Charlie Manson had a *following*, but this list is composed of the *following points*...."
In a nutshell, "following" as an adjective should never stand alone. The "following <things>" phrase should be immediately followed by the <things> under discussion. The "following <things>" phrase should be replaced by the alternative "<things> that follow" when the <things> under dicussion are distant from the "following" phrase.
"... the Widget dialog contains the following fields:
"The fields that follow appear in the Widget dialog, the Thingummy dialog, and the Thingambob dialog:
"Canada's Leading Technical Documentation Firm"
mail -at- niva -dot- com http://www.niva.com