TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Use Clear Subject Headings From:"Tony G. Rocco" <trocco -at- NAVIS -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 4 Nov 1996 14:20:01 -0800
A post can be as creative and interesting as the author cares to make it,
as far as I am concerned. I simply want to know what it is about before
reading it. That's the only issue. Creativity is fine *in the post itself,*
but in the heading, I would like explicitness.
>>but I for one
>>would rather see much less creative, much more descriptive, i.e., literal,
>>subject headings. Anyone else agree?
> This sounds like a directive from IBM or Pacific Bell. I can feel the
>walls becoming pale and the skies clouding over in a uniform, suppressing
>blanket. Shhhh. Variation Is Not Allowed.
> Anything that injects a little bit of color in life is a good thing.
>Don't we all deal with literal text throughout the day? Can't there be the
>slightest break ever? I think so.
> Besides which, I understood what the messages you quoted were going to be
>like before I double-clicked them. I didn't know specifics, like what the
>person was going to be specifically asking advice about for example--but
>what subject line could have been a literal description and still come in
>under 100 characters?