TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Killer Language From:"Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 11 Nov 1996 09:50:24 -0800
>I'm sorry for the interruption or for
>executing/killing/??? the discussion.
>Carry on. ;-)
To answer Patricia Funston, who said...
>>the original exchange was about =
>>using terms such as abort, execute, and kill in computer documentation. =
>>Since that has been an issue in my workplace and for our corporate style =
>>guide, I was glad to see the discussion.
So, now I have to ask--because I'm really curious about this one--
who's the target audience? Because *not* using these terms that are
so firmly established in software-industry parlance would never have
occurred to me. What made *you* (those of you who have considered
purging "violent" terms from documentation) think of it?
Enquiring minds wanna know!
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com
-- The _Guide_ is definitive.
Reality is frequently inaccurate.