TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
"Etymology" means origin and development of a word, doesn't it? It's not
a science explaining how meanings have been locked down and set for all
time. The suffix "-man" has changed over time like the meaning of every
other word. (Nothing's static--especially not language and, I would hazard
a guess, particularly not English. It's a grossly inefficient and
needlessly difficult language that speakers constantly alter to simplify.)
Citing etymology as a justification for contemporary use isn't valid.
The centuries-old origin of a word is hardly relevant to the issue if the
word in question is no longer used that way today. Take the word "gay" for
example. Who in America walks down a hallway all smiles and says "I'm so
gay today" to coworkers when they mean "happy?" That "gay" had another
meaning a century ago has no bearing on how that word is chosen today.
Etymology is a pretty interesting field to me. I like reading about
origins of words because I'm a writer and I studied history throughout much
of my life. However, when I sit down at the keyboard I don't think about
what a word's origin was centuries ago or what root language it's derived
from--I try hard to think of how the word is used right now today in
American English (my audience).