Re: Correct Wording for Examples (#932777)

Subject: Re: Correct Wording for Examples (#932777)
From: wburns -at- MICRON -dot- COM
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 07:40:53 MST

Elna responds,

>No, it is NOT correct to avoid using these abbreviations, which are in
>wide use in the non-technical audience.

>If you're getting static from a technical reviewer on this, point out
>that most users generally know what e.g. and i.e. mean. If you have
>doubts about the literacy levels of your user, you can spell them out.


Hmmm. This position flouts most of what I've read in technical writing style
guides. In fact, I work in a technical environment in which both of these
abbreviations are misused consistently. Very few of these folks know the Latin
for these abbreviations, and too many pick up the bad habits of writers who use
the initialisms indiscriminantly. Perhaps it's not that big an issue when an
experienced operator or technician running a machine comes across these
initialisms in a simple procedure, but it could definitely be an issue if, in a
safety document, someone confuses the two terms and we wind up in a lawsuit
because of the misunderstanding. I'll stick with "that is" and "for example."

Bill Burns
Assembly Documentation Supervisor
wburns -at- micron -dot- com
-----------------------------------------
This message brought to you by W.A.S.T.E.
and your local potsmaster.
-----------------------------------------


Previous by Author: Re: Word 7 etymology (#699200)
Next by Author: Re: Funky (bad) bullets from RoboHelp 95! (#948783)
Previous by Thread: Help for Notes Applications
Next by Thread: Re: Correct Wording for Examples (#932777)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads