TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:e.g. zample From:Eta Kushner <etawrite -at- NETMEDIA -dot- NET -dot- IL> Date:Tue, 26 Nov 1996 06:54:29 +0200
At 10:54 AM 25/11/96 -0600, svictor -at- HOUSTON -dot- GEOQUEST -dot- SLB -dot- COM wrote:
>Steve Shewchuk wrote:
>> I like to think of them as:
>> i.e. = "innus effectus"
>> e.g. = "examplus gratuitous"
>> Silly, I know. But you'd be surprised how easy they are to remember that
>I just remember that "id est" means "it is," and so e.g. must be the
>Stephen P. Victor
There's another silly way that I've always thought makes it easy:
For egzample. It's pronounced egzactly as it is spelled of course.