TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Beg to differ: unless you taking photographs of the screen, the
> monitor has nothing to do with the quality of the captures. The
> video card itself shouldn't either. Unless you're in XWindows or
> something, a 400x300 pixel window is going to be 400x300 pixels
> whether it's taking up most of a 640x480 screen, or merely a small
> corner of a 1280x1024 screen. Monitor, video card and display
> resolution will certainly affect how the capture *looks* on your
> system, but they should not have any effect on the quality of the
> capture itself.
You are right for windows with a fixed size, for example most dialog
But you are wrong for resizeable windows and full screen windows. If
I want to make a nice screen dump of a full size window, I will get a
640x480 pixels graphic on with a 640x480 screen. And I will get a
1280x1024 pixels graphic from a 1280x1024 screen. Etc.
By the way, I have discovered a special problem when using 1280x1024
screendumps: distortion due to W/H ratio. Look here:
Wonder who invented 1280x1024? It should have been 1280x960 if it was
to have the same W/H ratio as the rest of them.
Greetings from Denmark
PRC (Peter Ring Consultants)
- specialists in user friendly manuals and audits on manuals.
prc -at- pip -dot- dknet -dot- dk http://www.pip.dknet.dk/~pip323/index.html
- the "User Friendly Manuals" website with links, bibliography, list
of prof. associations, and tips for technical writers.