TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:tests From:Camille Krug <camillek -at- FUTURE -dot- DSC -dot- DALSYS -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 9 Dec 1996 14:57:26 -0600
I agree with Roger, Lisa et al that anyone worth their salt won't be
offended by having to take a test: it's just good business. It is truly an
objective means of gauging skills at various levels.
When you think of how often many of us pull rabbits out of a hat on a daily
basis, taking a 20-minute timed test is a piece of cake. As far as the dtp
or word processing packages: most are intuitive these days (insert a frame,
create a style, add a footer, etc.). BTW, I hate tests. But in this
case, they definitely serve a purpose.
camillek -at- dalsys -dot- com
stet -at- connect -dot- net
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Lisa Higgins wrote:
> I know some people hate this, and I don't mean to start a flamewar,
> but a well-designed writing test can really go a long way toward
> determining ability. Have your candidates rework a poorly worded and
> designed technical document (no more than a page long), have them
> describe, in writing, how they approach a new writing project, or
> something else that can help them show you all of their abilities (of
> course, have them do this in the DTP or WP of your choice, so that
> they can do a little design and formatting).
> Lisa Higgins
> lisa -at- drddo1 -dot- lucent -dot- com