Re: errored frame

Subject: Re: errored frame
From: Steve Evanina <Steve -dot- Evanina -at- SCIATL -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 16:37:00 -0500

Sorry for the bandwidth, I lost the address of the original poster.

>My client's datasheet contains the following statement: >
>The XYZ frame includes the Error Indicator bit which shows >if the
current frame is "errored frame."
>
>I changed it to "error framed." The client claims this phrase >is an
industry standard and should read: "errored frame." >Any suggestions
as to which is correct?
>
>If this is not of interest to the list, I will be happy to receive
>responses off line.

I assume the industry is telecom. In the past I documented T1, T3,
SONET concepts. In this industry, it is an "errored frame", an
"errored second", a "severely errored second", a "consecutive severely
errored second", a "bursty second".

steve -dot- evanina -at- sciatl -dot- com


Previous by Author: [no subject]
Next by Author: <enter> key
Previous by Thread: [no subject]
Next by Thread: Re: errored frame


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads